## L Hopitals Rule

< Limits | Home Page | Orders of growth >

In previous modules, we saw that Taylor series are useful for computing certain limits of ratios. But sometimes, a fact known as L'Hopital's rule is easier to use than Taylor series. While L'Hopital's rule is commonly taught in a first calculus course, the justification for why it works is not usually taught. This module gives a justification for L'Hopital's rule, using Taylor series.

## L'Hopital's rule

There are some limit situations where Taylor series are not particularly easy to use. For example, if the limit is being taken at a point about which the Taylor expansion is not already known, or the limit is at infinity, then using Taylor series is usually more work than it is worth. These are the situations where L'Hopital's rule can be helpful.

L'Hopital's Rule, case

If and are continuous functions such that and , then , provided this limit exists. If this is still of the form , then derivatives may be taken again, and so on.

The Taylor series for and about are given by

Since, by hypothesis, , it follows that

Now, as , all the terms with go to 0, which leaves . If this fraction is still , then L'Hopital's rule says to take the derivative of the numerator and the denominator again. In terms of the Taylor series, this moves to the next leading terms in the numerator and denominator.

**Example**
Using L'Hopital's rule, compute two of the limits from the last module:

These are both in the case, so differentiating numerator and denominator gives

**Example**
Compute .

Since , we are in the case of L'Hopital's rule. Recall that

Thus, applying L'Hopital's rule gives

Depending on the situation, it still might be easier to use Taylor series, especially if there are compositions and products of functions (assuming we know all the relevant Taylor series).

**Example**
Compute .

We know all the relevant Taylor series for the functions in this problem, so that should be an easier method. We find

Using L'Hopital here would be quite a lot of work. It turns out that we would have to apply the rule four times, which involves a lot of product and chain rule.

L'Hopital's Rule, case

If , then , again provided this limit exists.

**Example**
Compute .

Note that as , and as . Therefore, the case of L'Hopital's rule applies. Applying the rule,

**Example**
Use L'Hopital's rule to compute .

Since are all continuous functions, and , the hypotheses for L'Hopital's rule are met. So it follows that

Note that although we know the Taylor series for these functions at , the limit here is as . Thus, we cannot use the Taylor series approach, because a Taylor series about does not give a good approximation when is not close to 0.

## Other indeterminate forms

Some limits do not initially look like cases where L'Hopital's rule applies, but with some algebra they can be rearranged into one of the applicable cases. These are called *indeterminate forms*.

### Case:

First, consider , where . Usually, one or both of and are ratios of other functions. In this case, getting a common denominator usually transforms the limit into one where L'Hospital's rule or a Taylor series approach applies.

**Example**
Compute .

Getting a common denominator, and then Taylor expanding gives

### Case:

Next, consider where and . Since is not defined, it is not clear what this limit is. However, the product can be turned into one of the following ratios where L'Hopital's rule applies:

since dividing by the reciprocal of a number is the same as multiplying. Now, note that , since . Thus, is now in the case of L'Hopital's rule.

Similarly, is in the form of l'Hopital's rule, and so it can be applied here too.

Deciding which of the above forms to use depends on the situation, but in many situations either form will work.

**Example**
Compute . (Here we use the one-sided limit becuase is only defined on the positive real numbers).

This is of the form . In this case, it is easier to flip into the denominator, because it is easier to take the derivative of than it is to take the derivative of . So, we find

which is of the form , so applying L'Hopital's rule gives

### Case:

Another indeterminate form arises when raising one function of to a power which involves another function of . Suppose and . Then what is ?

On the one hand, it seems that raising to any power should be . On the other hand, raising anything to the 0th power should be 1. To find what the answer actually is, let

and take the of both sides. Now, recall that is a continuous function. Therefore, from the rules of limits in the last module, taking of a limit is the same as the limit of the :

(the last step uses the fact that ). Now, this is of the form , which was covered above. Note that when this limit is computed, it is which has been found, and so the answer must be exponentiated to find , the original limit.

**Example**
Compute .

This is of the form. Let . Then taking gives

(L'Hopital's rule was used in the second to last step). So , and so is the answer.

### Case:

Consider the limit , where and . Because is not defined, this is another indeterminate form. It can be dealt with as the case, by first taking , computing the resulting limit, and then exponentiating.

**Example**
Compute .

Letting , and taking logarithms gives

by an example above. Thus .

## Limits going to infinity

L'Hopital also works with limits going to infinity; the same hypothesis and conclusions hold. Before doing some examples, what does it mean for ?

Limit at infinity

if and only if for every there exists such that whenever . If there is no such , then the limit does not exist.**Example**
Compute .

Both the numerator and denominator go to as , so applying L'Hopital's rule gives

**Example**
Compute .

The numerator and denominator both go to as , so this is the case of L'Hopital's rule. It follows that

Note that L'Hopital's rule was used twice here since is still the case.

While L'Hopital often works, there are situations where it fails to give an answer, and a little extra thought must be employed.

**Example**
Compute .

Recall that . Both and as . But applying L'Hopital's rule (and then applying it again) gives

so L'Hopital's rule clearly will not give us an answer here. Instead, writing out the definition of and doing a little algebra, we find

**Example** Compute .

Using L'Hopital's rule, we find

since the denominator goes to 1 (from the previous example) and the numerator goes to infinity.

It is also possible to deal with limits going to infinity using Taylor series, but it involves some algebra. The idea is to use a substitution to turn the limit going to infinity into a limit going to zero. Symbolically, if , then let . It follows that as , and by replacing with throughout, the limit is transformed.

This process works when the limit at 0 exists. A more general technique would only look at the one-sided limit from the right-hand side:

**Example**
Compute .

Using the substitution , the limit becomes

as was shown in the last module.

## EXERCISES

Compute the following limits. Should you use l'Hopital's rule or Taylor expansion?

< Limits | Home Page | Orders of growth >